10779/rcsi.10778231.v1 Michael J. Barrett Michael J. Barrett John Cronin John Cronin Adrian Murphy Adrian Murphy Siobhan McCoy Siobhan McCoy John Hayden John Hayden SinéadNic an Fhailí SinéadNic an Fhailí Tim Grant Tim Grant Abel Wakai Abel Wakai Corrina McMahon Corrina McMahon Sean Walsh Sean Walsh Ronan O'Sullivan Ronan O'Sullivan Intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in the emergency department treatment of severe painful sickle cell crises in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland 2019 Administration Intranasal Adolescent Aerosols Analgesics Opioid Anemia Sickle Cell Child Preschool Double-Blind Method Emergency Service Hospital Fentanyl Humans Infant Injections Intravenous Ireland Morphine Nebulizers and Vaporizers Pain Pain Measurement Research Design Severity of Illness Index Time Factors Treatment Outcome Young Adult Family Care 2019-11-22 16:00:56 Journal contribution https://repository.rcsi.com/articles/journal_contribution/Intranasal_fentanyl_versus_intravenous_morphine_in_the_emergency_department_treatment_of_severe_painful_sickle_cell_crises_in_children_study_protocol_for_a_randomised_controlled_trial_/10778231 <p>BACKGROUND: Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) frequently and unpredictably present to the emergency department (ED) with pain. The painful event is the hallmark acute clinical manifestation of SCD, characterised by sudden onset and is usually bony in origin. This study aims to establish if 1.5mcg/kg of intranasal fentanyl (INF; administered via a Mucosal Atomiser Device, MAD™) is non-inferior to intravenous morphine 0.1 mg/kg in severe SCD-associated pain.</p> <p>METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a randomised,double-blind, double-dummy active control trial of children (weighing more than 10 kg) between 1 year and 21 years of age with severe painful sickle cell crisis. Severe pain is defined as rated seven or greater on a 0 to 10 age-appropriate numeric pain scale or equivalent. The trial will be conducted in a single tertiary urban paediatric ED in Dublin, Ireland. Each patient will receive a single active agent and a single placebo via the intravenous and intranasal routes. All clinical and research staff, patients and parents will be blinded to the treatment allocation. The primary endpoint is severity of pain scored at 10 min from administration of the study medications. Secondary endpoints include pain severity measured at 0, 5, 15, 20, 30, 60 and 120 min after the administration of analgesia, proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia and incidence of adverse events. The trial ends at 120 min after the administration of the study drugs. A clinically meaningful difference in validated pain scores has been defined as 13 mm. Setting the permitted threshold to 50% of this limit (6 mm) and assuming both treatments are on average equal, a sample size of 30 patients (15 per group) will provide at least 80% power to demonstrate that INF is non-inferior to IV morphine with a level of significance of 0.05.</p> <p>DISCUSSION: This clinical trial will inform of the role of INF 1.5mcg/kg via MAD in the acute treatment of severe painful sickle cell crisis in children in the ED setting.</p> <p>TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN67469672 and EudraCT no. 2011-005161-20.</p>