Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Browse

Application of the Intervention Complexity Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews within a Cochrane review: an illustrative case study [version 1; peer review: 3 approved]

Download (309.44 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2022-09-06, 11:11 authored by Cathal Cadogan, Audrey Rankin, Simon Lewin, Carmel M. Hughes

Background: The intervention Complexity Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews (iCAT_SR) has been developed to facilitate detailed assessments of intervention complexity in systematic reviews. Worked examples of the tool's application are needed to promote its use and refinement. The aim of this case study was to apply the iCAT_SR to a subset of 20 studies included in a Cochrane review of interventions aimed at improving appropriate polypharmacy in older people. 

Methods: Interventions were assessed independently by two authors using the six core iCAT_SR dimensions: (1) 'Target organisational levels/categories'; (2) 'Target behaviour/actions'; (3) 'Active intervention components'; (4) 'Degree of tailoring'; (5) 'Level of skill required by intervention deliverers'; (6) 'Level of skill required by intervention recipients'. Attempts were made to apply four optional dimensions: 'Interaction between intervention components'; 'Context/setting'; 'Recipient/provider factors'; 'Nature of causal pathway'. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa coefficient. Disagreements were resolved by consensus discussion. The findings are presented narratively. 

Results: Assessments involving the core iCAT_SR dimensions showed limited consistency in intervention complexity across included studies, even when categorised according to clinical setting. Interventions were delivered across various organisational levels and categories (i.e. healthcare professionals and patients) and typically comprised multiple components. Intermediate skill levels were required by those delivering and receiving the interventions across all studies. A lack of detail in study reports precluded application of the iCAT_SR's optional dimensions. The inter-rater reliability was substantial (Cohen's Kappa = 0.75) 

Conclusions: This study describes the application of the iCAT_SR to studies included in a Cochrane systematic review. Future intervention studies need to ensure more detailed reporting of interventions, context and the causal pathways underlying intervention effects to allow a more holistic understanding of intervention complexity and facilitate replication in other settings. The experience gained has helped to refine the original guidance document relating to the application of iCAT_SR.

Funding

Health Research Board [HRC/2014/1]

Charlemont Award from the Royal Irish Academy

South African Medical Research Council

History

Comments

The original article and an updated version may be available on https://hrbopenresearch.org/

Published Citation

Cadogan CA, Rankin A, Lewin S, Hughes CM. Application of the Intervention Complexity Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews within a Cochrane review: an illustrative case study [version 1; peer review: 3 approved] HRB Open Research. 2020;3:31

Publication Date

1 June 2020

PubMed ID

32596632

Department/Unit

  • School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences

Publisher

F1000 Research Ltd

Version

  • N/A