Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Browse

Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study of clinical, biochemical, and radiological outcomes in a non-designer centre at minimum 15 years' follow-up

Download (332.23 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-06-10, 14:30 authored by Martin DaveyMartin Davey, Conor Farrell, Conor KilkennyConor Kilkenny, Conor MedlarConor Medlar, Niall P McGoldrick, John F Quinlan

Aims: Although the use of metal-on-metal (MoM) implants in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a topic of controversy, prior literature has reported satisfactory ten-year clinical and radiological outcomes following Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR), subsequently resulting in a recent Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) rating of 15 A*. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes, radiological outcomes, and revision rates following BHR at a minimum of 15 years' follow-up in a non-designer centre.

Methods: Two investigators performed a retrospective review to identify consecutive patients who underwent BHR in our institution over a seven-year period (2003 to 2009, at minimum 15 years' follow-up) in a non-designer centre. Evaluation of clinical (Oxford Hip Scores (OHS)), biochemical (cobalt and chromium levels), and radiological (plain film radiographs) outcomes was carried out. Survivorship analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves, with all-cause surgical revision defined as a definitive endpoint for analysis. Descriptive statistical analysis was carried out.

Results: Overall, 96 patients (86 males) at a mean age of 51.4 years (SD 9.9; 27 to 69) underwent 105 BHR procedures (nine bilateral) with at least 15 years' minimum follow-up. Mean OHS was 38.3 (SD 9.6; 17 to 48) at 15-year minimum follow-up. The overall survivorship was 94.3% at 15 years post BHR, with an all-cause revision rate of 5.7%. Only eight BHR prostheses (8.2%) had radiolucent lines on plain films, none of which were listed for revision at the time of latest follow-up, while 32 patients had undergone MRI at 170 months (SD 54.9; 6 to 249) post BHR, with evidence of fluid collection, aseptic lymphocyte-dominant vasculitis-associated lesion, and metallosis identified on the MRI of four patients, four patients, and one patient, respectively. For 98.4% (60/61) of patients, cobalt and chromium values were either within normal limits (68.9%, n = 42) or less than double the upper limit of normal (29.5%, n = 18).

Conclusion: This study found that BHR demonstrates an acceptable survivorship of 94% at 15 years of minimum follow-up, with satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes to reflect this low all-cause revision rate in a non-designer centre.

Funding

The open access fee for this paper was self-funded

History

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed in the current study are not publicly available due to data protection regulations. Access to data is limited to the researchers who have obtained permission for data processing. Further inquiries can be made to the corresponding author.

Comments

The original article is available at https://boneandjoint.org.uk/

Published Citation

Davey MS, Farrell C, Kilkenny C, Medlar C, McGoldrick NP, Quinlan JF. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study of clinical, biochemical, and radiological outcomes in a non-designer centre at minimum 15 years' follow-up. Bone Jt Open. 2025;6(4):413-418.

Publication Date

8 April 2025

PubMed ID

40195656

Publisher

British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery

Version

  • Published Version (Version of Record)