Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Browse

Clinical management of ovarian function suppression in premenopausal women with breast cancer: a survey of members of ASCO

Download (619.55 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-01-27, 11:43 authored by Catherine M Kelly, Kathleen BennettKathleen Bennett, Caitriona CahirCaitriona Cahir, Andrea Eisen, Lajos Pusztai

Purpose: Ovarian function suppression (OFS) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHas) is a standard of care for premenopausal patients with high-risk stage II/III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC). Practical guidance on the optimal choice of GnRHa, timing, schedule, and monitoring is limited. Our aim was to determine how oncologists use OFS in routine care.

Methods: We designed a questionnaire to determine the choice of GnRHa, schedule, duration, initiation, use of bone modifiers, and monitoring of estradiol (E2). The questionnaire was sent to oncologists treating BC, in practice for >1 year and participating in the ASCO Research Survey Pool (RSP). It was also forwarded by investigators to oncologists meeting these criteria. The survey was open between November 14, 2023, and January 5, 2024.

Results: Of 996 oncologists participating in the ASCO RSP, 178 (18%) completed the survey. An additional 56 oncologists contacted by investigators responded. Respondents were from the United States (57%), Asia (15%), and Europe (14%). Goserelin (54%) and leuprolide (39%) were the most frequently used GnRHas and were administered once every month by 46%. Approaches to starting GnRHas were varied. Most continued them for the duration of aromatase inhibitor therapy (57%). Estradiol monitoring was performed regularly, sometimes, or never by 43%, 27%, and 27%, respectively. The E2 assays used were standard (65%), ultrasensitive (16%), and unknown (14%). Interpreting E2 assay results were considered difficult by 55%; however, 62% of oncologists changed treatment on the basis of them. A total of 92% of respondents would like ASCO guidance on the practical use of OFS.

Conclusion: Considerable practice variation exists for similar clinical scenarios in OFS administration. Respondents would welcome ASCO guidance on all aspects of OFS.

Funding

Mater Hospital Foundation

History

Comments

The original article is available at https://ascopubs.org/

Published Citation

Kelly CM, Bennett KE, Cahir C, Eisen A, Pusztai L. Clinical management of ovarian function suppression in premenopausal women with breast cancer: a survey of members of ASCO. JCO Oncol Pract. 2024:OP2400502

Publication Date

12 November 2024

PubMed ID

39531598

Department/Unit

  • Data Science Centre
  • School of Population Health

Research Area

  • Cancer
  • Population Health and Health Services

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Version

  • Published Version (Version of Record)