Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Browse

Post-COVID-19 recovery and geriatric rehabilitation care: a European inter-country comparative study

Download (918.07 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-22, 17:47 authored by Lisa S van Tol, Tiangao Lin, Monique A A Caljouw, Matteo Cesari, Frances DockeryFrances Dockery, Irma H J Everink, Bahaa N Francis, Adam L Gordon, Stefan Grund, Luba Matchekhina, L Mónica Perez Bazan, Eva Topinková, Mark A Vassallo, Wilco P Achterberg, Miriam L Haaksma, EU-COGER consortium

Purpose: There is variation in organization of geriatric rehabilitation across Europe. The purpose of this study was to describe the selection criteria for referral to geriatric rehabilitation, care provided, and recovery trajectories of post-COVID-19 patients referred to geriatric rehabilitation in Europe.

Methods: This observational cohort study included 723 patients in 59 care facilities for geriatric rehabilitation across 10 countries. Patient data were collected from medical records on admission to geriatric rehabilitation (between September 2020 and October 2021), discharge, 6 weeks and 6 months follow-up. The primary and secondary outcomes were recovery in daily functioning (Barthel Index) and Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) from admission to discharge. These were examined using linear mixed models with two levels (measurements nested in patients) and country as an independent variable. Random intercept and random linear slope parameters were added when they improved model fit. A survey about organization of geriatric rehabilitation for post-COVID-19 patients was filled out by country coordinators and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inductive coding of answers to open questions.

Results: Patients had a mean age of 75.7 years old and 52.4% were male. Many countries used various combinations of the selection criteria, such as functional status, age, frailty, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, comorbidities, and cognitive impairments. Most patients received physiotherapy (88.8%) and occupational therapy (69.7%), but there was substantial variance between countries in the percentages of patients that received protein or calorie enriched diets, oxygen therapy, and other treatment components. In all countries, patients showed recovery in daily functioning and quality of life, although there was variation in between countries in rate of recovery. Daily functioning seemed to increase most rapidly in the Czech Republic, Germany, and Russia. The steepest increases in quality of life were seen in the Czech Republic, Germany, and Spain.

Conclusion: Post-COVID-19 patients showed recovery during geriatric rehabilitation, albeit at variable rates. The observed variation may be explained by the heterogeneity in selection criteria and care provided. This study highlights the need for harmonization of measurements in geriatric rehabilitation order to perform explanatory research and optimize geriatric rehabilitation throughout Europe to ensure optimal patient recovery.

Funding

Leiden University Fund (Leiden Empowerment Fund, grant number LEF2106-2-47)

Zorg Onderzoek Nederland en Medische Wetenschappen (ZonMw)

UK National Institute of Health Research Academic Research Collaboration-East Midlands (ARC-EM)

History

Data Availability Statement

The data are not publicly available due to the agreement with participating care facilities and the consent provided by patients included. Researchers who wish to conduct analyses using EU-COGER data should submit a proposal to P.I. Prof. Wilco Achterberg (W.P.Achterberg@lumc.nl) including research questions and an analysis plan. If the request is approved, a data transfer agreement has to be signed before the data will be shared.

Comments

The original article is available at https://link.springer.com/

Published Citation

van Tol LS. et al. Post-COVID-19 recovery and geriatric rehabilitation care: a European inter-country comparative study. Eur Geriatr Med. 2024

Publication Date

13 August 2024

PubMed ID

39136862

Department/Unit

  • Beaumont Hospital
  • School of Medicine

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Version

  • Published Version (Version of Record)