Prevention of surgical-site infections: paradoxes in surgical dogma and sustainability
Of all hospital-acquired infections, surgical-site infections (SSIs) accounted for 16% in a recent European study1. These infections have significant consequences for patients, in terms of morbidity, pain, and, sometimes, even death, as well as increased durations of hospital stay and significantly increased healthcare costs2. Guidelines to prevent SSIs have been produced in the UK and beyond, to assist in prevention, and these often categorize measures into preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative interventions3,4. For example, the application of alcohol-based disinfectants is recommended for the surgical site before surgery, maintaining a normal blood glucose level and avoiding hypothermia are advised for the intraoperative phase, and removing drains when clinically indicated is advocated in the postoperative interval.
History
Data Availability Statement
Any data relevant to this manuscript will be made available, where at all possible.Comments
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in [insert journal title] following peer review. The version of record Humphreys H, Hill ADK. Prevention of surgical-site infections: paradoxes in surgical dogma and sustainability. Br J Surg. 2024;111(11):znae285. is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae285Published Citation
Humphreys H, Hill ADK. Prevention of surgical-site infections: paradoxes in surgical dogma and sustainability. Br J Surg. 2024;111(11):znae285.Publication Date
7 November 2024External DOI
PubMed ID
39506521Department/Unit
- Beaumont Hospital
- Clinical Microbiology
- Surgery
Research Area
- Immunity, Infection and Inflammation
- Nursing and Midwifery
- Surgical Science and Practice
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)Version
- Accepted Version (Postprint)